Taller final

Intersubjectivity 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersubjectivity

Intersubjectivity is a key term used in philosophy, psychology, sociology and anthropology to conceptualize the psychological relation between people. It is usually used in contrast to solipsistic individual experience, emphasizing our inherently social being.

Definition

The term has been defined in at least three ways[1]:

    First, in its weakest sense intersubjectivity refers to agreement. There is intersubjectivity between people if they agree on a given set of meanings or a definition of the situation. For example, Thomas Scheff defines intersubjectivity as "the sharing of subjective states by two or more individuals."[2]

    Second, and more subtly intersubjectivity refers to the "common-sense," shared meanings constructed by people in their interactions with each other and used as an everyday resource to interpret the meaning of elements of social and cultural life. If people share common sense, then they share a definition of the situation.[3]

    Third, the term has been used to refer to shared (or partially shared) divergences of meaning. Self-presentation, lying, practical jokes, and social emotions, for example, all entail not a shared definition of the situation, but partially shared divergences of meaning. Someone who is telling a lie is engaged in an intersubjective act because they are working with two different definitions of the situation. Lying is thus genuinely inter-subjective (in the sense of operating between two subjective definitions of reality).

Intersubjectivity emphasizes that shared cognition and consensus is essential in the shaping of our ideas and relations. Language, quintessentially, is viewed as communal rather than private. Therefore, it is problematic to view the individual as partaking in a private world, one which has a meaning defined apart from any other subjects. But in our shared divergence from a commonly understood experience, these private worlds of semi-solipsism naturally emerge.

Intersubjectivity can also be understood as the process of psychological energy moving between two or more subjects. In a room where someone is lying on their deathbed, for example, the room can appear to be enveloped in a shroud of gloom for other people interacting with the dying person. The psychological weight of one subject comes to bear on the minds of others depending on how they react to it, thereby creating an intersubjective experience that, without multiple consciousnesses interacting with each other, would be otherwise strictly solitary. Love is a prime example of intersubjectivity that implies a shared feeling of care and affection, among others.

A. Categorias lexicales y uso del diccionario.

1. Selecciona un texto relacionado con tu area de interes.

Identifica 3 palabras que no conoces. Buscalas en el diccionario, escribe su significado en español.. Agrega las abreviaciones. Indicar que tipo de palabra es (contenido- funcion)

• solipsistic. adj. Palabra de Contenido  

 Entails the theory that the self is the only thing that can be known and verified.

Implica la teoría de que el yo es la única cosa que puede ser conocida y verificada

• subtly. adv. Palabra de Contenido

So slight as to be difficult to detect or describe; elusive

Tan sutil que se hace difícil de detectar o describir; escurridizo

• quintessentially adv. Palabra de Contenido

Of, relating to, or having the nature of a quintessence; being the most typical

De, relacionado con, o poseedor de la naturaleza de quintaesencia; siendo el más típico

Word definitions from http://www.thefreedictionary.com 

2. Idea principal del texto (en español). Explique que dice el texto en sus propias palabras.

"Intersubjectivity is a key term used in philosophy, psychology, sociology and anthropology to conceptualize the psychological relation between people. "

• Idea principal: La Intersubjetividad es un término clave utilizado en filosofía, psicología, sociología y antropología para conceptualizar la relación psicológica entre las personas
• Resumen: el texto presenta las tres definiciones centrales relacionadas con la Intersubjetividad, la primera tiene que ver con el acuerdo que existe entre las personas con respecto a los significados compartidos, la segunda tiene que ver con el "sentido común", producto de la interacción social, y la tercera enfatiza la necesidad de consenso para la conformación de nuestras ideas y relaciones.

3. Categorias lexicales: (2 ejemplos por categoria)

Palabras de contenido: philosophy, contrast

Palabras de Función: for, the

Sustantivos: anthropolog, energy

Verbos: used, refer
Adverbio: partially, genuinely
Adjetivo: social, different
Artículo: The, a
Preposiciones: for, between
Conjunción: and, but
Cognados verdaderos: individual, cultural

Cognados Falsos: Prime

Sufijo: sharing, commonly
Prefijos: Intersubjectivity,  interactions

B. Estructura de la oracion:

1. Seleccione dos oraciones de un texto relacionado con su experticia. (Incluya referencia)

• Primera Oración: "Love is a prime example of intersubjectivity that implies a shared feeling of care and affection, among others."

Frase nominal:  "Love "

Nucleo de la frase nominal: Love

Pre modificadores:

Post modificadores:

Frase verbal: is a prime example of intersubjectivity that implies a shared feeling of care and affection, among others.

Nucleo de la frase verbal: is

Tiempo verbal: Presente simple (tercera persona singular)

• Segunda Oración: "The psychological weight of one subject comes to bear on the minds of others depending on how they react to it, thereby creating an intersubjective experience that, without multiple consciousnesses interacting with each other, would be otherwise strictly solitary "

Frase nominal:  "The psychological weight of one subject"

Nucleo de la frase nominal: weight

Pre modificadores: The psychological

Post modificadores: of one subject

Frase verbal: comes to bear on the minds of others depending on how they react to it, thereby creating an intersubjective experience that, without multiple consciousnesses interacting with each other, would be otherwise strictly solitary "

Nucleo de la frase verbal: comes

Tiempo verbal: Presente simple (tercera persona singular)

2. Señales algunos referentes presentes en su texto

It,  "The term"

Unidad 3

Técnicas de lectura: predicción, scanning y skimming

• Seleccione un texto que tenga una imagen.

Re-describing the conceptual presentation of collaborative intelligence in Polytopia as a playground of engagement.

http://spacecollective.org/Wildcat/5042/Considering-a-Polytopia-The-notes

It is my view that Collective Intelligence (CI’), though widely used, is a concept that is, for lack of a better description, misunderstood and probably misapplied, primarily because of the inadequacy of the term intelligence.
Intelligence is a very difficult concept to come to terms with, especially since our tendency to oversimplify language constructs pushes us towards a mode of monolithic thought, a regularity or normalization.
In many ways the term intelligence is not unlike the term culture, both are very broad terms referring to an increasingly expanding field of research, exploration and development.
In both cases the question of time need be inserted into the understanding of the concept for it to be coherent. Intelligence and culture are concepts that contain different levels of coherency, and to my eyes operate in a fashion that is similar to the fractal perspective. It is my view that intelligence is fundamentally Rhizomatic, and indeed so is culture, as is art.

note: The context in which the following definitions will be presented is that of the collective mind.
The collective mind context reflects the interaction of specific minds (individuals).
The interaction of individual minds is assumed (for the purpose of this context) to be consistent across all platforms of human existence/behavior and all platforms of communication.
In the context of the collective intelligence, an individual is assumed to be an agency, aware and conscious, intelligent and independent within the constraints of the material universe.

Observe la imagen y conteste las siguientes preguntas.

• De acuerdo al título y la imagen: ¿cuál cree usted que es el tópico que está a punto de leer?

Como la inteligencia se comporta según el modelo de los fractales de manera colaborativa.

Luego lea el texto

• ¿Cuál es la idea general del texto? 

La inteligencia colectiva ha sido mal entendida muy a menudo. La inteligencia al igual que la cultura, es un concepto que opera de una manera similar a la perspectiva de los fractales.

• ¿Que palabras se repiten? 

  intelligence, Collective,  culture, mind

• ¿Que palabras se parecen al español? 

Collective,  language, fractal, communication

• ¿Cuales son las palabras en negrita, el titulo, subtitulo o gráficos que te ayudan a entender el texto? 

 "Re-describing the conceptual presentation of collaborative intelligence in Polytopia as a playground of engagement."

"Intelligence is fundamentally Rhizomatic"

El dibujo de un fractal

• ¿De qué trata el texto? Lee el primer párrafo y el último o la ultimas ideas del último párrafo.

 La Inteligencia Colectiva es un concepto mal entendido, ya que el término inteligencia es inadecuado, es colectva porque resulta de la interacción de los individuos.

Unidad 4

Patrones de Organización de un Párrafo

A. Seleccione un texto relacionado con su área de experticia. Lea el texto y extraiga:

Value (personal and cultural)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_values

A personal or cultural value' is an absolute or relative ethical value, the assumption of which can be the basis for ethical action. A value system is a set of consistent values and measures. A principle value is a foundation upon which other values and measures of integrity are based. Those values which are not physiologically determined and normally considered objective, such as a desire to avoid physical pain, seek pleasure, etc., are considered subjective, vary across individuals and cultures and are in many ways aligned with belief and belief systems. Types of values include ethical/moral value, doctrinal/ideological (religious, political) values, social values, and aesthetic values. It is debated whether some values which are not clearly physiologically determined are intrinsic such as altruism and whether some such as acquisitiveness should be valued as vices or virtues. Values have typically been studied in sociology; anthropology; social psychology; moral philosophy and business ethics.
Values can be defined as broad preferences concerning appropriate courses of action or outcomes. As such, values reflect a person’s sense of right and wrong or what “ought” to be. “Equal rights for all”, "Excellence deserves admiration", and “People should be treated with respect and dignity” are representative of values. Values tend to influence attitudes and behavior. For example, if you value equal rights for all and you go to work for an organization that treats its managers much better than it does its workers, you may form the attitude that the company is an unfair place to work; consequently, you may not produce well or may perhaps leave the company. It is likely that if the company had a more egalitarian policy, your attitude and behaviors would have been more positive.

•  Las definiciones 

   "A personal or cultural value' is an absolute or relative ethical value, the assumption of which can be the basis for ethical action"

  "A value system is a set of consistent values and measures. "

  "A principle value is a foundation upon which other values and measures of integrity are based" 

  "Values can be defined as broad preferences concerning appropriate courses of action or outcomes. "

• y los marcadores de definición. 

is an, is a, defined as

B. Seleccione otro texto relacionado con su área de experticia y extraiga las palabras de secuencia u ordenamiento del tiempo. (biography)

Edgar Morin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edgar Morin is a French philosopher and sociologist born Edgar Nahoum in Paris on July 8, 1921. He is of Judeo-Spanish (Sefardi) origin. He is known for the transdisciplinarity of his works.

At the beginning of the 20th century, Morin's family migrated from the Greek town of Salonica to Marseille[1] and later to Paris, where Edgar was born. He first became tied to socialism in connection with the Popular Front and the Spanish Republican Government during the Spanish Civil War. When the Germans invaded France in 1940, Edgar fled to Toulouse, where he assisted refugees and committed himself to Marxist socialism. As a member of the French Resistance he adopted the pseudonym Morin, which he would use for the rest of his life. He joined the French Communist Party in 1941. In 1945, Morin married Violette Chapellaubeau and they lived in Landau, where he served as a Lieutenant in the French Occupation army in Germany.

In 1946, he returned to Paris and gave up his military career to pursue his activities with the Communist party. Due to his critical posture, his relationship with the party gradually deteriorated until he was expelled in 1951 after he published an article in Le Nouvel Observateur. In the same year, he was admitted to the National Center of Scientific Research (CNRS).

Morin founded and directed the magazine Arguments (1954–1962). In 1959 his book Autocritique was published.

In 1960, Morin travelled extensively in Latin America, visiting Brazil, Chile, Bolivia, Peru and Mexico.He returned to France where he published L'Esprit du Temps.

That same year, French sociologist Georges Friedmann brought him and Roland Barthes together to create a Centre for the Study of Mass Communication that, after several name-changes, became the Edgar Morin Centre of the EHESS, Paris.[2]

Beginning in 1965, Morin became involved in a large multidisciplinary project, financed by the Délégation Générale à la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique in Plozévet.

In 1968, Morin replaced Henri Lefebvre at the University of Nanterre. He became involved in the student revolts that began to emerge in France. In May 1968, he wrote a series of articles for Le Monde that tried to understand what he called "The Student Commune." He followed the student revolt closely and wrote a second series of articles in Le Monde called "The Revolution without a Face," as well as co-authoring Mai 68: La brèche with Cornelius Castoriadis and Claude Lefort.[3]

In 1969, Morin spent a year at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, California.

In 1983, he published De la nature de l’URSS, which deepened his analysis of Soviet communism and anticipated the Perestroika of Mikhail Gorbachev.

Morin was married to Johanne Harrelle, with whom he lived for 15 years.

In 2002, Morin participated in the creation of the International Ethical, Scientific and Political Collegium.

• Marcadores de Tiempo y de Secuencia:

on , At the beginning, first, in, after, In the same year

Entrada final de Blog: Reflexión

Escribe una entrada final donde reflexiones sobre los aspectos de tu curso que te ayudaron a caminar esta aventura con éxito. incluye los siguientes aspectos:

1. Clases en el laboratorio
2. Materiales: presentaciones PPP, diccionarios, teléfono, computadoras
3. Compañeros de clase
4. Uso del blog como cuaderno digital
5. ¿puedes enfrentar un texto en ingles sin miedo?
6. ¿vas a continuar leyendo textos en ingles?
7. ¿que sugieres para los próximos cursos?